Professor Eric Goldman was quoted in a July 7th New York Times article about a new Canadian court ruling affirming that emojis qualify as a contract agreement; in a July 14th Law.com article about trademark litigation and mass-intellectual property lawsuits against e-commerce sellers; in a June 20th MIT Technology Review about counterfeit lawsuits and aggressive trademark litigation; in a June 30th Orange County Register article about California’s Age Appropriate Design Code Act; in a July 26th MediaPost and July 27th POCIT article on the role of Section 230 in recent court cases; and in Internet Law & Policy Foundry’s July 13th Season 4 Episode 17 about decentralizing social media, content moderation, and market competition.
Among recent court cases Professor Goldman has weighed in on via his blog: “DC Circuit Upholds FOSTA’s Constitutionality” (Woodhull v. U.S.), “Amazon Can Freely End Book Reviewer’s Authoring Privileges” (Haywood v. Amazon), “An E-Commerce Site Tried to Form Its TOS Three Different Ways. None of Them Worked” (Chabolla v. ClassPass), “Court Finally Rejects “Discrimination” Lawsuit Against YouTube” (Divino v. Google), “Reddit Defeats Lawsuit Over Removal of r/WallStreetBets Moderator’s Privileges” (Rogozinski v. Reddit), and “Revisiting Bananas, Duct Tape, Walls, & Copyright” (Morford v. Cattelan).
Read our recent article detailing Professor Goldman’s comments on Internet law.
