Skip to main content
School of Law Homepage

Immigration Appellate Practice Clinic

The U.S. Court of Appeals is the largest federal circuit and also has the largest number of immigration cases, in which the Court reviews removal, or deportation, orders. For petitioners for review who do not have counsel, the Court may appoint counsel. Over the past fifteen years, the Court has appointed Santa Clara Law to represent the petitioner in many cases.

In the Immigration Appellate Practice Clinic, law student practitioners represent the client under the supervision of a clinical professor. The students consult with the client, review the administrative record, research the case, write the appellate briefs, and present oral argument before the Court. They also investigate the case for any other avenues of relief. Their work truly changes the lives of their clients.

The Immigration Appellate Practice Clinic will present oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in four cases in Fall 2025.

LAW 538 : Immigration Appellate Practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

This course gives students an opportunity to enhance their advocacy skills through representation of individual clients in immigration cases pending before the United States court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Students will represent clients under the Ninth Circuit’s Pro Bono Program, which appoints counsel for certain applicants appearing pro se before the Court. Cases selected for the Pro Bono Program present issues of first impression complex issues of fact or law, or meritorious claims warranting further briefing. The Ninth Circuit’s Pro Bono Coordinator has requested that Santa Clara University School of Law participate in the Pro Bono Program.

Pre-requisite: Immigration Law. 

Contact Professor Abriel for enrollment instructions.

The COVID-19 virus and the resulting shelter-in-place orders may have limited our physical mobility, but the needs of Santa Clara Law’s clinic clients have not stopped, and neither have the clinical students. Throughout Santa Clara Law’s clinics, students continue to support their clients and to work on their behalf, going the extra mile for their clients during these difficult times. Here is a brief description of our continuing work.


The intrepid Immigration Appellate Practice students used their minds and their pens (well, computers, really) to carry on their work for their clients. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit appointed Santa Clara Law as counsel for four individuals seeking judicial review of administrative orders denying their claims for asylum. The facts of the clients’ cases were vastly different, and they came from many parts of the globe – Ukraine, Honduras, Guinea, and Ethiopia. But all shared a common need for safety and for effective legal representation. The students provided that representation by filing an extensive brief in each client’s case, and they will present oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in October 2020. Each brief represented hundreds of hours of work by the students.

It gave us particular comfort that all four of our clients have recently been released from immigration custody. At least they do not have the additional anxiety of facing COVID-19 in crowded detention facilities.

Immigration Appellate Practice Clinic Team working together from home: Jared Renteria, Keuren Parra Morelos, Prof. Abriel.

Santa Clara Law’s Immigration Appellate Practice Clinic has successfully completed a case that has been ongoing since 2019!

Four years ago, alongside Santa Clara Law students, Professor Evangeline Abriel worked with the U.S. Court of Appeals to grant their client relief from removal, based on his showing of probable persecution if he returned to his home country of Togo. Their case prevailed at the Ninth Circuit in 2019, where our clinic members wrote a brief to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Our students then acquired new evidence, and after presenting it to the Immigration Judge, recently obtained a ruling in their client’s favor.

While many law students have worked on this case over the past four years and others have served as interpreters and translators, Vicente Lovelace 3L is the current student who has worked hard to secure the ruling for this case. “The winning formula in effective advocacy is to read the record and know the law,” Lovelace notes. “Due to IAPC’s preparation, a years-long legal saga ended in less than 15 minutes.”

When asked what he did after the hearing, Abriel and Lovelace’s client responded that he had found a mosque, and had gone to it to give thanks. “I’m not religious, Lovelace says, “but I believe that there’s more to learn from his actions than my own.”

The Immigration Appellate Practice Clinic gives our students the opportunity to represent real clients under the supervision of our professors. Students consult with the client, review the administrative record, research the case, write the appellate briefs, and present oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals. 

  • Alcazar-Martinez v. Garland, 2024 WL 3824650 (9th Cir. Aug. 15, 2024)
  • Acevedo-Granados v. Garland, 992 F.3d 752 (9th Cir. 2021)
  • Barannik v. Barr, 827 Fed.Appx. 754 (9th Cir. 2020)
  • Nava-Romero v. Sessions, 736 Fed. App’x 632 (9th Cir. 2018)
  • Alvarado-Garcia v. Lynch, 665 Fed. App’x 620 (9th Cir. 2016)
  • Blandino-Medina v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1338 (9th Cir. 2013).
  • Yaogang Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2011)
  • Vizcarra-Ayala v. Mukasey, 514 F.3d 870 (9th Cir. 2008)
Faculty Supervisor

Clinical Professor of Law; Director, Center for Social Justice and Public Service

Evangeline Abriel